Crowdsourced Brand Naming: Using Contests and Community Input

Naming contests. Crowdsourcing platforms, legal ownership, quality control, community engagement strategies.

Trademark Lens Team

Crowdsourced naming: 99designs, NamingForce, SquadHelp run brand name contests. Budget: $200-2,000. Get 100-500 name submissions. But 87% of winning names face trademark conflicts requiring changes. Cheap creative, expensive legal cleanup.

How Contests Work

Platform model: Post brief describing brand, target market, values. Set prize ($200-2,000 typical). Creatives submit names. You review, give feedback, select winner. 5-10 day timeline.

Guaranteed option: Pay premium ($500-1,500), get guaranteed name or refund. More entries, higher quality submissions. Platform promotes your contest to top performers.

Average naming contest: $599 prize = 247 submissions. $1,299 prize = 412 submissions. Higher prize = more volume, not necessarily better quality.

Platform Comparison

99designs: Design-focused, premium pricing. $500-1,500 typical. Good for name + logo combo. Quality over quantity. Audience skews corporate, professional.

SquadHelp: Largest naming-specific platform. Includes trademark pre-screening (basic). $199-699 typical. Most submissions per dollar. Audience includes professional namers.

NamingForce: Smaller, niche. $200-500 typical. Community of dedicated naming enthusiasts. Quirky creative names. Less corporate-friendly.

Rights transfer: Platform contract should assign all IP rights to contest holder. Check terms. Some platforms retain rights until payment. Some allow designer to reuse rejected names.

Trademark clearance: Your responsibility, not platform's. 87% of winning crowdsourced names face trademark conflicts. Budget $2K-5K for professional clearance search after selection.

Trademark conflict rate: Crowdsourced names 87%, agency names 34%, professional naming firms 12% - cheaper creative = more expensive legal issues.

Quality Control

Brief clarity matters: Vague brief = generic submissions. Specific brief = targeted creativity. Include: industry, target customer, values, name length preference, style examples.

Active feedback: Rate submissions daily. Guide creatives toward what you want. "Love abstract words, dislike literal descriptors" steers entries. Passive contest holders get mediocre results.

Common Problems

Volume over quality: Get 300 names, 290 are terrible. 8 are acceptable. 2 are good. Sifting through volume = time sink. Consider if 10 hours sorting worth $500 prize savings vs agency.

Similar submissions: Multiple designers submit "CloudFlow" for cloud software. Not collaboration, just obvious thinking. Winning name may have 12 near-identical submissions. Originality questionable.

Trademark ignorance: Designers don't check trademark databases. Submit "Apex Solutions" unaware 400 existing Apex trademarks exist. Name is creatively fine, legally impossible.

Rejected crowdsourced names: 73% trademark conflicts, 18% domain unavailable, 9% other issues - only 27% of winning contest names actually usable.

Community Involvement

Customer naming contests: Ask your audience. Social media poll with 3-5 finalist names. Engagement boost, customer investment, viral potential. Risk: Lose control, get joke submissions.

Famous failures: "Boaty McBoatface" won UK research vessel naming contest. Government overruled. Mountain Dew's "Hitler Did Nothing Wrong" from 4chan trolling. Public voting = vulnerability to hijacking.

Hybrid Approach

Contest for ideas, agency for execution: Use crowdsourcing to generate creative directions. See patterns in submissions. Then hire professional naming agency to develop those directions properly. Best of both: crowd creativity + professional trademark clearance.

Cost: $500 contest + $5K agency refinement = $5.5K total. Cheaper than $15K pure agency, better quality than pure crowdsourcing.

Hybrid model success rate: 68% find registrable name vs 13% pure crowdsourcing - professional refinement fixes trademark issues.

Internal Contests

Employee naming competition: Boost morale, encourage ownership, tap insider knowledge. Prize: $500-2,000 or extra PTO. Risk: Politics (CEO's assistant suggests terrible name, must consider it seriously).

Anonymous submission: Use SurveyMonkey or Google Form. Removes politics. Judge names blindly. Shortlist 5-10, then reveal submitters. Meritocracy over hierarchy.

When to Crowdsource

Budget under $3K: Crowdsourcing makes sense. Professional agency costs $10K-50K. Contest + DIY trademark check = viable alternative for bootstrapped startups.

Non-critical brand: Internal project name, secondary product line, temporary campaign. Not your company name or flagship product. Lower stakes = crowdsourcing appropriate.

When to Skip Crowdsourcing

Core brand identity: Company name, main product line, rebranding. Too important to risk trademark issues or mediocre quality. Pay for professional naming firm. $20K well spent vs $1M rebrand later.

Regulated industries: Pharma, finance, legal. Name approval processes complex. Need professional naming with deep industry knowledge. Crowdsourced names won't survive compliance review.

Trademark Lens checks crowdsourced name finalists - verify trademark availability before announcing contest winner to avoid public commitment to unregistrable name.

Ready to Verify Your Business Name?