File trademark before launch or after revenue? Wrong choice costs $50K+ in rebrand or $250K+ in legal disputes. 73% of startups filing after launch face conflict they could've avoided with $350 pre-launch search.
File Before Launch
If brand name = core to business. If domain = exact match only. If budget allows $350 filing fee. File Intent-to-Use (ITU) application 6 months before launch. Secures priority date. Blocks competitors.
ITU = "I intend to use this mark." USPTO gives you 3 years to launch product. Priority date = filing date, not launch date. Beats anyone filing after you, even if they launch first.
Register After Launch
If bootstrapped ($350 = significant cost). If testing 3-4 brand name variations. If product-market fit uncertain (might pivot). Use name 6-12 months, validate, then file. Cheaper upfront, riskier long-term.
Use-based application = "I'm already using this mark." Faster approval (8-12 months vs 10-14 months for ITU). But no retroactive protection. Someone files same mark while you're testing = you lose.
The Startup Dilemma
Pre-revenue startup filing trademark = betting on name before validating business. Expensive bet. But waiting = someone else files same name while you build. No perfect answer.
The Conflict Window
Gap between launch and trademark filing = vulnerability window. Launch Jan 1. File trademark Mar 1. Two-month window where competitor could file same name Feb 15 and claim priority. You used it first, but they filed first. Legal mess.
Priority = filing date (ITU) or first use date (use-based), whichever earlier. But proving first use = messy. Filing = clean date. Better to file first than prove use first in court.
Common Law Rights
Using name = automatic common law trademark rights in your geographic area. Don't need USPTO registration. But unregistered marks = weak. Can't sue nationwide. Can't use ® symbol. Can't stop Amazon seller in different state.
Registered trademark = nationwide protection. Can sue infringers anywhere in US. Can stop counterfeiters. Can license/sell trademark. Common law = local only. Registration = national armor.
The Marketplace Problem
Amazon Brand Registry requires registered trademark. Etsy, eBay, Shopify anti-counterfeit tools = need ®. Launching on marketplace without trademark = can't protect brand from copycats. They'll clone product with similar name.
Timeline: File ITU trademark 6 months pre-launch. Launch product. Submit Statement of Use (SOU) after launch. Get registration. Then apply for Brand Registry. Total: 12-18 months. Plan ahead.
Cost Analysis
File before launch: $350 USPTO fee + $500-2000 attorney (optional). Total: $350-2350. Risk: $0 (name secured). File after launch: $0 upfront. Risk: 12% chance of conflict = $50K rebrand or $89K legal dispute average.
Expected value: $350 upfront insurance vs 12% × $69K average cost = $8,280 expected conflict cost. Math says file first. Unless $350 = rent money, file before launch.
The Rebrand Cost
Discover conflict after 6 months, 10K customers, $200K marketing spend. Rebrand = new domain ($2K-50K), new logo ($5K), new marketing ($50K), customer confusion (lost revenue), SEO reset. Total: $50K-500K depending on scale.
Industry Patterns
SaaS/tech startups: 67% file trademark before launch. Consumer packaged goods: 89% file before production. Service businesses: 34% file before launch (lower conflict risk). E-commerce: 45% file after testing product-market fit.
Venture-backed startups: File immediately (investors require clean IP). Bootstrapped: 50/50 split (budget constraints). Your pattern depends on capital and risk tolerance.
The Hybrid Strategy
File trademark for primary brand name before launch ($350). Test product variations under primary brand umbrella. If variation succeeds, file separate trademark for sub-brand. Example: File "Acme" pre-launch, then file "Acme Pro" after Pro tier gains traction.
Protects core brand while allowing experimentation. Costs $350 upfront (primary brand) + $350 later (sub-brand if needed). vs $0 upfront, $8K+ expected conflict cost for primary brand.
International Timing
Planning international expansion? File US trademark first (establishes priority date). Then file Madrid Protocol international application within 6 months for extended priority. Delay = someone files your name in EU/UK before you expand.
Cost: US trademark $350. Madrid Protocol $653-1400 (depends on countries). Total: ~$1K-2K for global protection. vs $250K legal dispute in foreign market after launching without trademark.
When Waiting Makes Sense
Testing 5 name variations = $1,750 to trademark all five. Wasteful. Instead: Test all five in Google Ads for 30 days ($3K budget). Pick winner. File trademark for winner only ($350). Saved $1,400 on unused trademark applications.
Pivoting likely? Don't file. Dropshipping testing products? Don't file. Low-commitment business model = wait. High-commitment (manufacturing, VC-backed, marketplace-dependent) = file first.
Check This First
Can you afford $350 filing fee? Is brand name core to business value? Are you launching on marketplaces (Amazon/Etsy)? Planning to scale nationally? Seeking venture capital? All yes = file trademark before launch. Any no = consider waiting.
But remember: Priority date = filing date. Every day you wait = risk someone else files first. The $350 question: Insurance or risk?
Trademark Lens shows existing trademark conflicts before you decide when to file, revealing whether pre-launch filing essential (crowded category) or post-launch acceptable (clear namespace).